@Iloveslots you were already told on another thread that the Batman games are Scorpion 6 which is not emulated on MFME so why are you asking for help doing this ?
It might be the author has rethought how to do the newer games given the new emulators on the scene. Many games are originally written on a PC or similar and then adapted to Scorp5 and/or Scorp6.
So @I have finished from what you have said you might just be interested in the Ipub2 as a cab but if you want to try and get it running first here are some tips from someone (not me) who worked on the Ipubs up until recently:
No Signal message - this could be that the micro switches on the (Firefox) board aren't being pressed - you can just remove them if you cannot sort this.
Battery Low - battery may be no good on the board but there is a temporary fix - get a battery holder for 2 x AA and crocodile clip the + and - across the board battery.
If you need more info PM me.
Good work @Zaphod77 doing some investigation into this.
I think it's well known that they had to update the programs as players were manipulating the cashpots on certain clubbers but great when you can show it.
No mate I think you are mixing it up with when you take the extra life (second up) and that removes it and you gamble to start your way back up from the bottom.
If the bonus not taken it just stays lit where it is if you lose the h/l - unless it's different on that particular square but I don't see why it would be. Or I am misunderstanding what you meant originally.
Actually maybe not - if you still had your life and it landed on the phone you could make your way up at the expense of the life then, if necessary, do the routine.
Yeah I thought they would take the rip out of the £100 which was easily done by stopping that last gamble winning (which is blocked sometimes anyway) but they just left it in.
This is where 'Claude' made a wrong assumption. You can stay on the first SPIN square but you can move around the board until you land on another and then still h/l forever if boxes not in view.
As I said before it's simply the coder thought it was of no consequence and as someone else said it would have been flagged in testing as a weird quirk if it was an error.
Carry on deciphering though